New Law Allows Employees to Recover Additional Penalties for the Willful Misclassification of an Independent Contractor | By: Kelly O. Scott
New Law Allows Employees to Recover Additional Penalties for the Willful Misclassification of an Independent Contractor | By: Kelly O. Scott

Labor Code section 226.8 has long prohibited the willful misclassification of an employee as an independent contractor, as well as the charging of fees to, or deducting for goods, materials, space rental, services, government licenses, repairs, or equipment maintenance from the compensation of, these persons.  The Labor Commissioner or a public prosecutor is permitted to recover penalties available under this section and can also recover these penalties as damages for the employee.  Effective January 1, 2027, Senate Bill 1444 will, in addition to an extensive list of more obscure changes, amend 226.8 to allow individual employees to directly collect these penalties. 

More specifically, the employee may recover from the employer a penalty of $5,000 to $15,000 for each violation under Labor Code section 226.8.  If it is determined that the employer engaged in a pattern or practice of these violations, the penalty is increased to a minimum of $10,000 and a maximum of $25,000 for each violation.  These penalties are in addition to other damages and penalties that the employee might recover, but the employee may not recover 226.8 penalties in addition penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act for the same violation. 

In addition to collecting penalties, the public announcement provisions set forth in Labor Code section 226.8 remain in place.  These require that the Labor and Workforce Development Agency or a court, as appropriate, order that the employer display prominently on its internet website or, if the employer has no website, in an area accessible to all employees and the general public at each location where a violation occurred, a notice that states that: the LWDA or court has found that the employer committed a serious violation of the law by engaging in the willful misclassification of employees; the employer has changed its business practices to avoid future violations; any employee who believes that they are being misclassified may contact the LWDA; and that the notice is posted pursuant to a state order.  The notice must include the contact information for the LWDA and must be signed by an officer or owner of the employer.  The notice must remain posted for a period of one year. 

As California employers know, ever since the California Supreme Court clarified existing law to apply the ABC test to determine employee versus independent contractor status in the landmark case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court in 2018, misclassification claims have become more common and easier to prove.  SB 1444 offers California employers additional incentive to review the classification of their independent contractor relationships and make any necessary changes before the law becomes effective.

This blog is presented under protest by the law firm of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. It is essentially the random thoughts and opinions of someone who lives in the trenches of the war that often is employment law–he/she may well be a little shell-shocked. So if you are thinking “woohoo, I just landed some free legal advice that will fix all my problems!”, think again. This is commentary, people, a sketchy overview of some current legal issue with a dose of humor, but commentary nonetheless; as if Dennis Miller were a lawyer…and still mildly amusing. No legal advice here; you would have to pay real US currency for that (unless you are my mom, and even then there are limits). But feel free to contact us with your questions and comments—who knows, we might even answer you. And if you want to spread this stuff around, feel free to do so, but please keep it in its present form (‘cause you can’t mess with this kind of poetry). Big news: Copyright 2026. All rights reserved; yep, all of them.

If you have any questions about this article, contact the writer directly, assuming he or she was brave enough to attach their name to it. If you have any questions regarding this blog or your life in general, contact Kelly O. Scott, Esq., commander in chief of this blog and Head Honcho (official legal title) of ECJ’s Employment Law Department.

Subscribe

Recent Posts

Blogs

Contributors

Archives

Jump to PageX

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek