Posts from September 2026.
Receivers have quasi-judicial immunity, but only for discretionary acts and decisions | By: Peter A. Davidson

Q:      In previous columns you have stated that state court receivers in California have quasi-judicial immunity. However, the cases cited were either unreported cases or cases where the party being sued was not a receiver, but a different functionary. Are there any reported California cases that explicitly hold that a state court receiver has quasi-judicial immunity?

A:      You are correct that California cases, up to now, that said state court receivers have quasi-judicial immunity were either unreported [Haider v. Speiser, 2012 WL 4101944 (2012), where the defendant was actually a ...

Ninth Circuit Permits EFAA Election After Arbitration Has Commenced | By: Jared W. Slater

An employee who files an arbitration demand on claims unrelated to sexual harassment is not necessarily barred from later proceeding in court under the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA). In Ding v. Structure Therapeutics, Inc., the Ninth Circuit held that an employee who discovers a plausible sex-based harassment claim during arbitration may invoke the EFAA and proceed in court.

Dr. Ding, the company’s former Chief Financial Officer, filed a demand for arbitration with JAMS alleging discrimination, retaliation, and ...

An Arbitration Clause Specific to an Employment Agreement Might Not Apply to Common Employment Claims | By Jared W. Slater

For the better part of a decade, employers have been required to continually revise their arbitration agreements to reduce the risk of unconscionability challenges that were the focus of numerous appellate court decisions. Throughout this process the clause defining the claims to which the arbitration agreement applied was often ignored, carrying over unchanged from one version to the next. The Fourth District’s decision in Morales v. Superior Court is a reminder that a carefully drafted arbitration agreement is of little use if it does not cover the claims the employee ...

EFAA Uncertainty Does Not Excuse a Delayed Motion to Compel Arbitration | By: Jared W. Slater

In the years since the enactment of the federal Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA), California courts have treated a single sufficiently pleaded harassment claim as rendering an entire case not subject to arbitration, even if other causes of action would have been covered by the employer’s arbitration agreement. Mitchell v. Lilac Solutions, Inc. holds that waiting to build a record against the harassment claim before moving to compel can be deemed a waiver of the right to arbitration by the employer.

In Mitchell, four former Lilac ...

A Reminder: the 2026 IRS Mileage Rates Have Increased | By: Joanne Warriner

Due to recent increases in fuel prices, the IRS announced a rare midyear increase to the 2026 mileage rates that may be used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical, or moving purposes.  Specifically, as of July 1, 2026, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) are:

  • 76 cents per mile driven for business use, up three and one-half cents from the rate for the first half of 2026;
  • 23.5 cents per mile driven for medical, or moving purposes for active-duty members of the Armed Forces, up three cents ...
MAC Attack: Why Material Adverse Change Clauses Rarely Save a Deal | By: Jeffrey R. Glassman

Buyers negotiate hard for a MAC condition. Courts almost never let them use it.


Every acquisition agreement allocates one uncomfortable question: Who bears the risk that the target's business deteriorates between signing and closing? The material adverse change (MAC) clause is the primary tool for answering it. It sits quietly in the closing conditions section until a deal goes sideways, and then it becomes the most litigated few words in the agreement.

The MAC clause is frequently the last provision to receive serious drafting attention and the first provision everyone wishes ...

Signed the Same Day, Read Together: The Mutuality Problem Hiding in Onboarding Documents | By: Jared W. Slater

An arbitration agreement can appear mutual on its face and still be interpreted as favoring the employer. That has become a recurring ground for courts to deny employer motions to compel arbitration, and Cluck v. GEO Secure Services, LLC is the latest example. In Cluck, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal held that the arbitration agreement had to be construed together with a confidentiality agreement the employee signed the same day. The two documents read together were held to be substantively unconscionable because they sent the employee’s likely claims to ...

Subscribe

Recent Posts

Blogs

Contributors

Archives

Jump to PageX

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek