Labor Code section 1174.1 already bars an employer from introducing payroll and related records as evidence when contesting certain Labor Commissioner citations in an administrative proceeding or writ proceeding if the employer did not produce those records in response to the Labor Commissioner’s duly served written request. Senate Bill 1316, which becomes effective January 1, 2027, broadens that rule. An employer will also be barred from “in any other way using or relying on” records it did not timely produce, including to impeach a witness. This means, for example, that time and pay records that were not produced on time may not be used to challenge a worker’s testimony on cross-examination.

SB 1316 will also extend to retaliation and discrimination citations issued under section 98.74. The statute’s list of covered records will expressly payroll, time, and employment records, including job title and wage rate history (section 432.3), Equal Pay Act records (section 1197.5), and personnel files (section 1198.5). Those records may bear directly on an employer’s defense to a retaliation claim, and they will carry the same consequences for late production as payroll and time records.

The deadlines associated with Labor Commissioner requests remains largely unchanged. A standard request must allow at least 15 days to respond, though the Commissioner may provide for less time by stating in the request why it is necessary to complete the investigation in a shorter period of time. For a standard request, an employer that notifies the Commissioner in good faith, before the deadline, that it needs more time receives an automatic 15-day extension. A clerical error is likewise excused if it is corrected and the records are produced “no later than 20 days from the date originally requested.” The statute does not say whether that period runs from the date the request was issued or from the production deadline it set. Under the first interpretation, an employer facing a 15-day deadline would have only five additional days to cure the error. Preclusion also does not apply where a court determines, before a citation issues, that the records need not be produced, and the Commissioner retains discretion to admit late records from an employer that cooperated, substantially complied, and made good faith efforts to comply.

SB 1316 also adds a parallel rule for public works by establishing Labor Code section 1742.05, which bars contractors and subcontractors contesting a civil wage and penalty assessment from using or relying on records they did not timely produce. A standard request under that section must allow at least 10 days, subject to the same shortened-period procedure, but any request for an extension of time to respond does not apply to requests for certified payroll records under section 1776 pertaining to public works projects.

The bill also amends section 98.2 so that the Labor Commissioner’s lien on an employer’s real property, which currently expires after 10 years, may be renewed for additional 10-year periods if the renewal is recorded before the lien expires.

This publication is published by the law firm of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. The publication is intended to present an overview of current legal trends; no article should be construed as representing advice on specific, individual legal matters. Articles may be reprinted with permission and acknowledgment. ECJ is a registered service mark of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. All rights reserved.