On March 19, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 95 providing a new form of COVID-19 related paid sick leave for many California workers. The law will become effective on March 29, 2021, and applies retroactively to sick leave taken beginning on or after January 1, 2021. All California employers with more than 25 employees and in-home supportive services providers are required to provide the supplemental sick leave benefits to employees. The law will remain in effect through September 30, 2021.
SB 95 provides for COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave for covered employees who are unable to work or telework due to certain reasons related to COVID-19. Qualifying reasons for employees to use this paid sick leave include: the employee is subject to a COVID-19 quarantine/isolation period required by local, state or federal order or guideline (the longest minimum period will apply); the employee has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19; the employee is attending an appointment to receive a COVID-19 vaccination; the employee is experiencing symptoms related to a COVID-19 vaccine that prevent the employee from being able to work or telework; the employee is experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and seeking a medical diagnosis; the employee is caring for a family member is subject to a quarantine/isolation order or guideline or who has been advised to self-quarantine; and the employee is caring for a child whose school or place of care is closed or otherwise unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19 on the premises.
Under the law, a covered employee is entitled to 80 hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave if that employee either works full-time or was scheduled to work, on average, at least 40 hours per week for the employer in the 2 weeks preceding the date the covered employee took COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave. For others who work part-time hours, if the employee has a normal weekly schedule, the employee is entitled to leave up to the total number of hours the employee is normally scheduled to work for the employer over two weeks. If the employee works a variable number of hours, the employee is entitled to 14 times the average number of hours the employee worked each day for the employer in the six months preceding the date the employee took COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave. If the employee has worked for the employer over a period of fewer than six months but more than 14 days, this calculation is to be based on the entire period the employee has worked for the employer. If the employee works a variable number of hours and has worked for the employer over a period of 14 days or fewer, the employee will be entitled to leave based on the total number of hours the employee has worked for the employer. The covered employee determines how many and when to use his or her available COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave.
Covered employers must take immediate steps to adjust wage statements. Specifically, wage statements must list any supplemental paid sick leave payment as a separate line item and list all available supplemental paid sick leave hours separate from other paid leave. Excluding regular sick leave, most employers may credit any supplemental paid sick leave hours provided to an employee since January 1, 2021, for the same purposes, such as hours taken under the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act. However, in-home supportive service providers may not credit FFCRA hours. In addition to the wage statements, covered employers must post a supplemental paid sick leave notice and send notice to workers not frequenting a workplace. A notice is scheduled to be available from the Labor Commissioner by March 26, 2021.
For any leave taken on or after January 1, 2021, for which SB 95 would now apply and which was unpaid or paid at an amount that did not meet the new requirements, the employee must request retroactive payment orally or in writing. Payment in response to such a request is due on or before the payday for the next full pay period after the request was made.
Employees not exempt from overtime requirements must be paid for their use of supplemental paid sick leave at the higher of: the employee’s regular rate of pay for the workweek in which COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave was taken; the employee’s total wages, not including overtime premium pay, divided by the employee’s total hours worked in the full pay periods of the prior 90 days of employment; the California minimum wage; or the local minimum wage. Employees exempt from overtime requirements must be paid for supplemental paid sick leave in the same way as the employer calculates wages for other forms of paid leave time for these employees. Supplemental paid sick leave benefits are capped at $511 per day and $5,110 in the aggregate for each employee, unless there is a federal increase in these previously established FFCRA limits.
All businesses with more than 25 employees are subject to the law, which is a significant expansion of prior COVID-19 sick leave legislation. Small businesses employing 25 or fewer workers are exempt from the legislation but are entitled to a federal tax credit if they do offer supplemental sick leave.
This publication is published by the law firm of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. The publication is intended to present an overview of current legal trends; no article should be construed as representing advice on specific, individual legal matters, but rather as general commentary on the subject discussed. Your questions and comments are always welcome. Articles may be reprinted with permission. Copyright 2021. All rights reserved. ECJ is a registered service mark of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. For information concerning this or other publications of the firm, or to advise us of an address change, please send your request to info@ecjlaw.com.
- Partner
Kelly Scott is a partner and head of the firm’s Employment Law Department.
Mr. Scott is also a member of the Litigation Department and has practiced law since 1987. His areas of practice include representation of employers in all ...
- Partner
Pooja S. Nair is a business litigator and problem solver with a focus on the food and beverage sector. She advises food and beverage clients, including restaurant groups, mid-market food brands, and food manufacturers on a ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
- Severing Unconscionable Terms in Employment Arbitration Agreements | By: Jared W. Slater
- Can You Collaterally Attack a Receiver’s Appointment?
- Changes to PAGA Create Opportunities for Employers to Minimize Penalties | By: Tanner Hosfield
- Overbroad Employment Arbitration Agreements Will Not Be Enforced in California | By: Jared W. Slater
- LA Al Fresco Deadline Extended | By: Pooja S. Nair
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014