Civil Code section 2860 authorizes the retention of independent counsel in the event a conflict of interest arises between the insurer and its insured. Under the statute a conflict of interest is deemed to arise “when an insurer reserves it rights on a given issue and the outcome of that coverage issue can be controlled by counsel first retained by the insurer for the defense of the claim”. Section 2860(b).
But what happens if, in the absence of insurer appointed counsel, the insured selects counsel to defend the claim, with the insurer’s acquiescence? In that circumstance, is the insured entitled to reimbursement for the cost of that counsel? And if so, do the hourly rate limitations in the statute apply?
The court addressed those issues in Long v. Century Indemnity Co., 163 Cal. App. 4th 1460 (2008). In that case, attorney Long represented his client Harris, a recycling company, in an environmental lawsuit pending in federal court. Harris tendered the claim to INA, Harris’ CGL carrier. INA ultimately agreed to provide a defense subject to a reservation of rights.
Because Long had previously represented Harris in a related matter, INA asked Long to defend Harris in the federal suit. INA agreed to pay Harris’ fees but only at a capped hourly rate that INA deemed applicable, with Long reserving his right to seek payment at a higher rate.
After the underlying suit was settled, Long filed a lawsuit against INA in which he sought damages representing the difference between the amount he was paid by INA and the amount he would have been paid at the rate he sought. Although the court’s holding had to do with whether Long’s suit was subject to mandatory arbitration under subdivision (c) of the statute, the more interesting aspect of the decision had to do with the carrier’s duty to provide for independent counsel even where the carrier had not retained appointed counsel.
In this regard, the court held that the applicability of section 2860 does not depend on the insurer’s retention of counsel to represent its interests in the underlying action. The court rejected Long’s argument that the duty to provide independent counsel was contingent upon the insurer’s retention of its own counsel:
But the potential conflict described in subdivision (b) exists because the interests of the insurer and its insured diverge, thereby precluding the use of counsel (absent a waiver by the insured) who purports to jointly represent the interests of both insurer and insured. It is not the presence of the insurer-selected attorney that creates the conflict; rather, the existence of the conflict or potential conflict creates the need for “independent” or Cumis counsel — an attorney who owes his or her allegiance solely to the insured. Even if the insurer forgoes its right to its own representation under these circumstances, the insured retains its right to independent counsel who it selects and controls.
This language may also come into play where, for example, an insurer accepts the defense but only with regard to coverage that has a minimal sublimit. In that circumstance, with little risk to the carrier from the standpoint of indemnity, the carrier may lack an economic motive for a vigorous defense of the insured. See, e.g., Tomerlin v. Canadian Indem. Co., 61 Cal. 2d 638, 648 (1964) (where carrier lacks incentive to mount a vigorous defense of its insured, “the insurer may not compel the insured to surrender control of the litigation”). Therefore, for a conflict to arise, it is immaterial whether the carrier has in fact appointed its own counsel to defend the insured in the litigation:
Reservation of rights coupled with control of issue affecting coverage dispute: Cumis counsel may be required, however, “where an insurer reserves its rights on a given issue and the outcome of that coverage issue can be controlled by counsel first retained by the insurer for the defense of the claim.” [Civ. C. § 2860(b) (emphasis added); see Long v. Century Indem. Co., supra, 163 CA 4th at 1472, 78 CR3d at 492 – immaterial whether insurer has “first retained counsel” to defend action if conflict or potential conflict exists], Croskey et al., Cal. Practice Guide: Insurance Litigation ¶ 7:774 (The Rutter Group 2023) (emph. added).
Finally, the Court in Long held that because section 2860 applied to Long’s fee dispute with INA, the statute’s mandatory arbitration provisions applied. As the court noted, “it has decided that within the California courts these Cumis fee issues are to be decided in an arbitration forum, not the state’s judicial forum.”
This publication is published by the law firm of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. The publication is intended to present an overview of current legal trends; no article should be construed as representing advice on specific, individual legal matters. Articles may be reprinted with permission and acknowledgment. ECJ is a registered service mark of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP. All rights reserved.
- Associate
Elliot Chen is an Associate in the Litigation Department, specializing in Intellectual Property, Insurance Coverage, and Complex Commercial Litigation. He holds a B.A. from Dartmouth College and a J.D. from Duke Law School.
- Partner
Peter S. Selvin, Chair of ECJ's Insurance Coverage and Recovery Department, is a business trial lawyer with more than 30 years of experience. While he specializes in the areas of insurance coverage and international litigation, his ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- New Law Expands Posting Requirements Regarding Workers’ Compensation Rights | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Entertainment Vendors Must Certify Safety Training for Employees By: Jared W. Slater
- California Employers Prohibited from Mandatory Religious or Political Meetings | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Expands Reach Of Crown Act to Prevent Discrimination Based On Natural and Protective Hairstyles | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- SB 1340 Allows Enforcement Of Local Employment Discrimination Laws | By: Kelly O. Scott
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014