
On November 9, 2020, the City of Los Angeles adopted an ordinance permitting businesses to refuse entry to anyone entering the premises without a face covering.
The ordinance adds Section 200.91 to the Municipal Code, which states: “[a]ny business owner or operator in the City of Los Angeles is authorized to refuse admittance or service to any person who refuses or fails to wear a Face Covering when on the premises of the business or when seeking or receiving service.”
A face covering is defined as “a face covering that covers the nose and mouth and is secured to the head with ties or straps or simply wrapped around the lower face. It can be made of a variety of materials such as cotton, silk, or linen. A face covering may be factory-made or sewn by hand or can be improvised from household items such as scarfs, T-shirts, sweatshirts, or towels. A compliant Face Covering does not include any face covering that incorporates a device, such as a valve, that facilitates air to exit from the face covering.”
This measure was first proposed in July 2020 by City Council Member Herb Wesson. At the time, Wesson stated that Los Angeles should follow in the footsteps of New York City, and “assist businesses to employ sensible health practices by requiring face covering when entering a place of business.” After receiving approval from a COVID-19 committee, the ordinance was unanimously approved at a City Council meeting on November 4, 2020, without discussion. The Mayor then approved the ordinance, and it officially went into effect on November 9. The ordinance is set to automatically expire on October 30, 2022.
The ordinance does not provide for any fines for customers who refuse to wear masks, or specific enforcement mechanism for businesses to use. Some restaurant owners have experienced strong negative reactions from customers to employees enforcing mask policies and the effect of the new ordinance remains to be seen.
- Partner
Pooja S. Nair is a business litigator and problem solver with a focus on the food and beverage sector. She advises food and beverage clients, startups and other businesses on a comprehensive range of issues, including employment ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- LA County Mandates “Hero Pay” for Grocery Workers
- 'Notice-Prejudice Rule' Ruling Could Provide New Arguments
- FDA/USDA: No Transmission of COVID-19 Through Food/Food Packaging
- Department of Labor Proposes Delay on Tip Regulations and Independent Contractor Rule
- Ninth Circuit Revives P.F. Chang’s “Krab Mix” Lawsuit
- Employer Alert: New Compensation Threshold for Computer Software Overtime Exemption
- Restaurant Rescue Plan Approved by Senate
- Can Receivers Reject Leases For The Benefit of Creditors?
- A Reminder: The IRS Mileage Rates Have Changed
- Can Product Reviews Be Subject To Lanham Act Liability?
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014