According to the California Department of Aging, more than 200,000 older and dependent adult abuse cases are reported each year. Many more cases certainly go unreported.
Lawyers and clients often have the misconception that the California financial elder abuse statute, Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610, et seq., applies only where there is some bad faith conduct committed by an alleged wrongdoer defendant. This is not the case. In 2008, the Legislature replaced the “bad faith” standard with a different requirement to establish whether the defendant “knew or should have known of the likely harm to the elder.” That is, there can be financial elder abuse when one acts or assists another in acting wrongfully irrespective of intent.
“Financial abuse” of an elder occurs when a person does any one of the following: “(1) Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both. (2) Assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both. (3) Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains, or assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining, real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult by undue influence.” Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30(a) (emphasis added).
“A person or entity shall be deemed to have taken, secreted, appropriated, obtained, or retained property for a wrongful use if, among other things, the person or entity takes, secrets, appropriates, obtains, or retains the property and the person or entity knew or should have known that this conduct is likely to be harmful to the elder or dependent adult.” Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30(b) (emphasis added). “Wrongful use” can exist by virtue of someone acting when he or she “should have known better” (as the Beatles sing).
But wait -- there is more. “For purposes of this section, a person or entity takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property when an elder or dependent adult is deprived of any property right, including by means of an agreement, donative transfer, or testamentary bequest, regardless of whether the property is held directly or by a representative of an elder or dependent adult.” Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30(c) (emphasis added). This means that a plaintiff elder may claim that a contract should be rescinded for financial elder abuse, simply because the contract is one-sided or obtained under questionable circumstances. In other words, one must exercise caution in doing any kind of business with someone over the age of 65. If you strike a deal with an elder that is too good to be true, and you “should have known better,” then that contract could be deemed to be too good to be true and set aside.
A recent California decision, Munoz v. PL Hotel Group, LLC (1/3/22) 73 Cal.App.5th 543, which was published and then de-published (so it cannot be cited as controlling authority) is illustrative. There, an 80-year-old real estate investor-buyer of a hotel in a leaseback transaction sued the seller, alleging that the seller had taken advantage of the buyer by surreptitiously inserting extremely adverse terms into the contract. The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court, which had dismissed the case at the pleading stage after it determined that that no fraud or incapacity had been properly alleged. The Court held that a plaintiff victim is not required to allege lack of capacity or that he was of an unsound mind to maintain a claim for financial elder abuse.
Similarly, our clients, a couple in their 70s who were sellers of real property, recently won a two week long jury trial which resulted in the setting aside an unfair contract that they had entered into under pressure. Herrera v. Full Circle, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV39580. We were not required to prove bad faith, fraud, or incapacity—one of the clients was a lawyer and they both had been licensed real estate salespersons. The jury found financial elder abuse on account of facts showing that the buyer had taken advantage, and he knew or should have known better, and it awarded compensatory and punitive damages.
- Partner
Geoffrey M. Gold is a Partner in the Litigation, Real Estate and Land Use Departments.
Geoff is a trial lawyer specializing in business and real estate matters. Clients appreciate Geoff’s ability and proven track record in ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- New Law Expands Posting Requirements Regarding Workers’ Compensation Rights | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Entertainment Vendors Must Certify Safety Training for Employees By: Jared W. Slater
- California Employers Prohibited from Mandatory Religious or Political Meetings | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Expands Reach Of Crown Act to Prevent Discrimination Based On Natural and Protective Hairstyles | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- SB 1340 Allows Enforcement Of Local Employment Discrimination Laws | By: Kelly O. Scott
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014