The EEOC issued final rules under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regarding employer-sponsored wellness programs which require disability-related information or medical exams, as well as final rules under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), regarding all employer-sponsored wellness programs. Employers should review the final rules, as the EEOC makes apparent that compliance with The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) nondiscrimination rules does not necessarily place an employer in compliance under the ADA or GINA.
The final rules, which are effective January 1, 2017, provide as follows:
Participation in wellness programs must be voluntary. To be considered voluntary, employees cannot be required to participate, and lack of participation cannot result in denial of, or limitations on, any group health coverage offered. Further, there can be no other adverse action taken against an employee who does not participate in the employer’s wellness program.
Notice requirements. For a wellness plan to be considered voluntary, written notice to employees must be provided that clearly describes the type of medical information that will obtained and its purpose, the restrictions on disclosure of the employee’s medical information, and includes the parties who will have access and the methods used to prevent improper disclosure as required under HIPAA. An EEOC sample written notice can be found here and questions and answers provided by the EEOC regarding the notice can be found here.
Must be reasonably designed to promote good health and prevent illness. Wellness programs must address treatment of conditions that are identified. The program’s main purpose cannot be to shift costs to employees or provide the employer with information used to estimate costs.
Financial incentive limitations. Participation incentives can’t exceed 30% of the total cost of employee-only coverage, including employee and employer contributions, but the ACA permits up to 30% of the cost of whatever coverage the employee has obtained, including family coverage. Interestingly, in the case of smoking cessation programs that do not involve nicotine testing, the EEOC rules permit incentives of up to 50% of the cost of employee-only coverage; if medical testing is involved, incentives may not exceed 30% of the cost of employee-only coverage. The testing limits placed under EEOC rules are inconsistent with ACA rules, which permit incentives of up to 50% for tobacco cessation programs and are justified, according to the EEOC, because testing means that the program is disability-related, and therefore subject to different restrictions. Under GINA rules, if a wellness program is open only to employees and family members in a particular group plan, the maximum incentive for the employee’s spouse to provide information about current or past health status is 30% of the total cost of employee-only coverage. If the employer offers more than one health plan, the maximum inducement permitted is 30% of the lowest cost major medical self-only plan offered. Other limits apply if the employer does not offer group health.
Genetic information limitations. Employers may provide limited incentives of up to 30% of the cost of self-only coverage to an employee whose spouse provides certain health information as part of a wellness program. Employers may not request, require or purchase genetic information, except for certain narrow exceptions. No incentives can be offered for providing genetic information regarding employees’ children, including adult children. Employers may not deny group health or other health benefits to an employee or the employee’s family on the basis that a spouse refuses to provide information regarding diseases or disorders.
Confidentiality of medical records must be ensured. Unless needed to administer the health plan, information gathered under wellness plans can only be given to the employer in the aggregate without disclosing employee identities
This alert is intended to note current legal trends in commercial lending and risk management issues. No alert should be construed as representing advice on specific, individual legal matters, but rather as an overview of the subject discussed. Your questions and comments are always welcome. Please do not hesitate to contact me at kscott@ecjlaw.com to further discuss this alert or to answer any questions.
- Partner
Kelly Scott is a partner and head of the firm’s Employment Law Department.
Mr. Scott is also a member of the Litigation Department and has practiced law since 1987. His areas of practice include representation of employers in all ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- New Law Expands Posting Requirements Regarding Workers’ Compensation Rights | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Entertainment Vendors Must Certify Safety Training for Employees By: Jared W. Slater
- California Employers Prohibited from Mandatory Religious or Political Meetings | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Expands Reach Of Crown Act to Prevent Discrimination Based On Natural and Protective Hairstyles | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- SB 1340 Allows Enforcement Of Local Employment Discrimination Laws | By: Kelly O. Scott
- Landlord: Look Out and Take Notice | By: Geoffrey M. Gold
- New Cal/OSHA Indoor Heat Standards Require New Prevention Measures and Written Prevention Plan | By: Joanne Warriner
- California Bans All Plastic Bags at Grocery Stores | By: Pooja S. Nair
- FTC’s Nationwide Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Stopped by Federal Court Ruling | By: Cate A. Veeneman
- Can the IRS Obtain a Receiver to Help Collect Taxes Owed? | By: Peter Davidson
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014