
On May 14, 2025, the California Court of Appeal issued a decision in Rose v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., addressing whether the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) can be held liable for an employer’s litigation costs in an unsuccessful Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action where the LWDA was not an active participant.
The plaintiff, a former cashier at Hobby Lobby, filed a representative PAGA action alleging violations of California’s “suitable seating” requirements. Following a nine-day bench trial, the court ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby. Hobby Lobby then sought to recover approximately $475,000 in litigation costs under California’s general cost recovery statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 1032(b), naming both Rose and the LWDA as jointly responsible.
The trial court rejected most of Rose’s objections and ordered the LWDA to pay $124,585.24 of Hobby Lobby’s costs, even though the LWDA had not intervened or participated in the litigation. The LWDA appealed.
The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s cost order, holding that even if prevailing employers may recover costs under section 1032(b), they cannot recover those costs from the LWDA when the LWDA did not actively participate in the litigation. The court rejected Hobby Lobby’s argument that the LWDA was a party to the litigation through an agent-principal relationship with the plaintiff. Further, the court reasoned that PAGA did not give the LWDA control over litigation brought by a PAGA plaintiff.
Key Takeaways for Employers
- Employers May Still Seek Costs—But Not From the State: The court declined to resolve whether prevailing employers are categorically barred from recovering costs under PAGA. But it clearly held that those costs cannot be imposed on the LWDA when the agency did not play an active role in the case.
- Litigation Strategy Consideration: When seeking cost recovery in the event that a PAGA case ends with a trial, employers should focus on the named plaintiff rather than the state, and be prepared for pushback, as prevailing employer cost recovery is still unsettled.
- PAGA Remains Unfriendly to Employers: Despite changes to PAGA that have alleviated a few concerns from employers, this decision suggests that some courts may believe that allowing cost-shifting against a nonparticipating state agency would discourage employee enforcement and undermine PAGA’s legislative purpose.
While Rose v. Hobby Lobby does not answer all outstanding questions about employer cost recovery under PAGA, it clearly signals that nonparticipating government entities are insulated from liability for litigation costs. Employers should monitor ongoing developments in this space and consult with counsel to evaluate cost recovery strategies and the litigation risk posed by PAGA claims.
- Associate
Tanner is an Associate in ECJ's Litigation and Employment Departments. His practice focuses on defending labor and employment actions, including both individual and class action cases. Tanner represents employers in a wide range ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Employers Beware: Lessons from Sanders v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County | By: Tanner Hosfield and Jared W. Slater
- California Court of Appeal Decision in Rose v. Hobby Lobby: No Recovery of Costs Against Nonparticipating State Agency | By: Tanner Hosfield
- California Court Narrows “Death Knell” Appeal Rule: Key Takeaways for Employers | By: Tanner Hosfield
- MGA Entertainment v. Harris: Despite $71M Judgment, Federal Court Declines to Enjoin Trade Dress Infringement, Revealing Limits to Presumption of Irreparable Harm | By: Kenny Hsu
- Patents Must Describe the “How” – A Reminder That Functional Claims Need Structural Support | By: Banu Naraghi
- California Court of Appeal Rejects "Headless" PAGA Claims in Williams v. Alacrity Solutions Group | By: Tanner Hosfield
- SCOTUS Declines to Hear Coke Zero Patent Case | By: Kelly W. Cunningham & Pooja S. Nair
- Kadrey v. Meta: The First Major Test of Fair Use in the Age of Generative AI | By: Jason L. Haas
- The Importance of Having an Up-To-Date Employment Arbitration Agreement | By: Jared W. Slater
- California Supreme Court Strikes Willful Injury Limitation in BBQ Sauce Manufacturing Dispute | By: Pooja S. Nair
Blogs
Contributors
Archives
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014